Comments on: Split Second Stats #1: Thin-slicing vs. unlimited time

By: Brooklyn Museum: Community: bloggers@brooklynmuseum » Split Second Stats #4: Engagement

Tue, 11 Oct 2011 15:51:40 +0000

[…] previous Split Second blog posts, we looked at the effects of thin-slicing, textual information, and gender. Put another way, we were studying the effects of how long you […]

]]>

By: Beau Sievers

Tue, 19 Jul 2011 18:32:56 +0000

Hi Jarak: those percentage ratings refer to the Split Second (4 second time limit) task only, not to any of the other tasks.

Glad you enjoyed the discussion!

]]>

By: Brooklyn Museum: Community: bloggers@brooklynmuseum » Split Second Stats #2: Adding Information

Tue, 19 Jul 2011 15:04:37 +0000

[…] bloggers@brooklynmuseum Split Second Stats #1: Thin-slicing vs. unlimited time […]

]]>

By: Brooklyn Museum: Community: bloggers@brooklynmuseum » Split Second Stats #2: Adding Information

Tue, 19 Jul 2011 15:04:37 +0000

[…] bloggers@brooklynmuseum Split Second Stats #1: Thin-slicing vs. unlimited time […]

]]>

By: jarak

Sat, 16 Jul 2011 01:20:31 +0000

Thank you for sharing the stats gathered from this project!

The Paintings -> Ratings / Reactions pages are great. To be clear, is the rating an overall rating?
e.g. the King Solomon and His Court: “This painting was chosen 76% of the time over other paintings.”

One minor issue I have:
The rankings plot (especially the engagement one) is really kind of hard to read.

Overall, I’m really enjoying this. Although I liked the Click! exhibit, I feel like I’m actually learning more about Indian paintings through this. Plus I also felt like I needed to see these in person (lots of detail that you need to see in person) whereas I was satisfied to see the photos (Click!) online, even though I did see that exhibition in person as well.

Great discussion last night too!

]]>